Home : Environmental Toxins : Lead Poisoning, Lead Paint : Jury Verdicts

Lead Poisoning, Lead Paint - Jury Verdicts

______ $518,444 - Toxic Exposure Toxic Exposure - Lead Paint - Minors - Juveniles - Premises Liability - Landlord/tenant
Facts: Plaintiff minors resided in premises located on Fairmount Avenue in Baltimore City from 1984 to 1987. The premises were owned and managed by defendants. In September 1986, forty-two lead violations were discovered on the premises. Plaintiffs allegedly suffered a diminution of their IQ as a result of ingesting lead paint.

Plaintiffs alleged that they ingested lead pai...
- from The Michigan Trial Reporter (105763) Login for Lead Poisoning, Lead Paint Verdict
______ $318,000 Breakdown: $30,000 compensatory - joint and several against all defendants; $288,000 punitive (75% against Sawchyn, 25% against Davis). - Punitive Damages Premises - Lead Poisoning - Child - Premises Liability - Juveniles
Facts: Plaintiff child and her parents were tenants in defendants' apartment building. The plaintiff allegedly was seen with chips of paint in her mouth and she was subsequently diagnosed as sustaining lead poisoning. The defendants had been cited by the housing authority for chipping/flaking paint. The defendants were engaged in a title dispute regarding the apartment building.
- from The Ohio Trial Reporter (117784) Login for Lead Poisoning, Lead Paint Verdict
______ $150,000 - Toxic Exposure Premises Liability - Apartment - Lead Poisoning - Minor - Premises Liability - Settlement - Juveniles
Facts: Plaintiff minor and his mother resided in his grandparents' apartment. The apartment building was owned by defendant landlord. While plaintiff was living on the premises, he allegedly ingested lead dust or chips, resulting in brain damage. Defendant was unaware that a minor was residing in the apartment.

Plaintiff alleged that he ingested lead dust or chips while re...
- from The Michigan Trial Reporter (105609) Login for Lead Poisoning, Lead Paint Verdict
______ $335,000 Breakdown: $235,000 from Lehman 100,000 from Hughes - Toxic Exposure Toxic Exposure - Lead Poisoning - Rented Premises - Landlord/tenant - Juveniles - Settlement
Facts: Plaintiff and his parents lived (at two different times) in two different rented dwellings owned by defendants. Plaintiff was ultimately hospitalized for five to six weeks with lead poisoning levels in the low fifties, classified as a class three risk out of four classes. The city discovered lead paint at both sites. Plaintiff suffered permanent brain damage, resulting in learning...
- from The Michigan Trial Reporter (105448) Login for Lead Poisoning, Lead Paint Verdict
______ Defense verdict - Worksite Accident Workers' Compensation Denied - Lead Poisoning - Defense Verdict - Employment - Labor Law - Toxic Exposure - Insurance
Facts: Plaintiff worked for fifteen years as a molder in the defendant's brass foundry. The defendant's plant closed and the plaintiff was terminated. The plaintiff's claim for workers' compensation was denied.

Plaintiff alleged that he lacked energy, had headaches and dizziness during his employment due to continuous exposure to lead. Further, said injury was received in ...
- from The Ohio Trial Reporter (117927) Login for Lead Poisoning, Lead Paint Verdict
______ $385,500 - Premises Liability Premises Liability - Apartment - Lead Poisoning - Landlord/tenant - Juveniles - Toxic Exposure
Facts: Plaintiff and her twin daughters were tenants in an apartment owned by defendants. The twins ingested peeling lead-based paint on the premises, resulting in brain damage. The twins were 6 years old at the time of trial.

Plaintiff alleged that defendants were negligent in failing to properly inspect and test the paint on the premises and that defendants knew or shoul...
- from The Michigan Trial Reporter (105558) Login for Lead Poisoning, Lead Paint Verdict
______ Defense verdict. The jury found defendants were not negligent. - Toxic Exposure Landlord/tenant - Toxic Exposure - Lead Paint - Minor - Landlord/tenant - Juveniles - Defense Verdict
Facts: Defendants owned rental property in the City of Detroit. Plaintiff, a four-year old boy, and his family had resided in one of defendant's units for four years. During the course of a routine check-up plaintiff was discovered to have an elevated blood lead level. An investigator employed by the Detroit Lead Poison Control Department discovered lead concentrations higher than accept...
- from The Georgia Trial Reporter (112056) Login for Lead Poisoning, Lead Paint Verdict
______ $5,500 - Premises Liability Toxic Exposure - Apartment - Lead Poisoning - Minor - Toxic Exposure - Juveniles - Landlord/tenant
Facts: Plaintiff, a three year old child, was a tenant in an apartment building owned and managed by defendants. Plaintiff was diagnosed with lead poisoning, resulting in brain damage and cognitive deficiencies.

Plaintiff alleged that defendant was negligent in failing to remove the lead paint from the apartment.

Defendant contended that: (1) they had no prior n...
- from The Michigan Trial Reporter (105940) Login for Lead Poisoning, Lead Paint Verdict
______ Defense verdict on claim against Slitzer and Hung Jury on claim against Edmonds. - Landlord/tenant Premises Liability - Rented Residence - Lead Poisoning - Toxic Exposure - Juveniles - Defense Verdict
Facts: Plaintiff minors resided in a house owned by defendants. They allegedly ingested lead paint chips resulting in brain damage. Defendant Edmonds owned the house initially and ultimately sold it to Defendant Slitzer.

Plaintiffs alleged that they became ill from the ingestion of lead paint and that defendants were negligent in failing to safeguard the property and in fail...
- from The Michigan Trial Reporter (106108) Login for Lead Poisoning, Lead Paint Verdict
______ Defense verdict - Toxic Exposure Toxic Exposure - Lead Paint - Minor - Landlord/tenant - Juveniles - Defense Verdict
Facts: Plaintiff, a four-year-old girl, resided in a house owned by Defendant Stark Metropolitan Housing Authority. She allegedly ingested lead-based paint chips in the house resulting in lead intoxication.

Plaintiff alleged that: (1) defendant knew or should have known of the presence of lead paint in the house; (2) the lead paint posed a danger to occupants of the house; an...
- from The Ohio Trial Reporter (120394) Login for Lead Poisoning, Lead Paint Verdict
Do you need a Lead Poisoning, Lead Paint lawyer in Washington, DC? Contact one of our Lead Poisoning, Lead Paint lawyers in Washington, DC now.

Content provided by JVRA.com. LegalView is not responsible for the accuracy of the information provided above.

Pages:   1   2   3   4   5   6   ...   Next

Need A Lead Poisoning, Lead Paint Attorney?

First Name Last Name Email Address State
Has Your Health Been Negatively Affected?

Please Describe the Injury

Your Friend's Email Address

Your Email Address

Type a Message (optional)


Do you need a Lead Poisoning, Lead Paint lawyer in Washington, DC? Contact one of our Lead Poisoning, Lead Paint lawyers in Washington, DC now.

 

Close (x)

Looking for an Attorney?


Please type your question:

Close (x)

logo Find Legal Help for Your Lead Poisoning, Lead Paint Case - Submit Your Information Below

Do you need legal assistance with your Lead Poisoning, Lead Paint case?
LegalView may be able to help.


Submit your information below for a free, no-cost evaluation.

We'll submit your information to one of our partner firms.
LegalView's partners represent clients throughout the United States, for a very wide range of legal issues. Submit your information now, to see if one of LegalView's partners can help!

* Indicates Required Fields

First name *
Last name *
Email Address *
Phone Number *
()  -

State *
Legal Issue * Environmental Toxins: Lead Poisoning, Lead Paint Change
Was There an Injury?
Please Describe The Injury

DISCLAIMER and STATEMENT OF NON-CONFIDENTIALITY

By submitting this form, you agree that completing the above is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship.

Disclosure

Legal WebTV Network LLC, LegalView.com, and LegalWebMedia.com are group advertising sponsored by the attorneys identified here. It is not a lawyer referral service. If you submit information on this website [more...]

Legal WebTV Network LLC, LegalView.com, and LegalWebMedia.com are group advertising sponsored by the attorneys identified here. It is not a lawyer referral service. If you submit information on this website, LegalWebMedia.com will submit your information to the law firms that pay for this group advertising and to respond to your requests for information concerning legal services in their assigned local areas. If there is no sponsoring firm in your state, your inquiry will be submitted to one of the sponsoring law firms on a predetermined, rotating basis. If the sponsoring law firm accepts your case, it will associate with licensed attorneys practicing in your state, if required; the sponsoring law firm may also contact other law firms to see if they may be able to assist.

The information provided by the LegalView.com and LegalWebMedia.com websites is for advertising and informational purposes and should not be considered as legal advice from the sponsoring attorneys. The websites contain general information and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts, or settlements. LegalView.com contains information created by others or supplied through open forums; the sponsoring law firms are not responsible for the accuracy of this information. Any person viewing or receiving information from these websites should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any such information without first seeking appropriate legal advice from an attorney in your area. Legal WebTV Network, LLC expressly disclaims any liability with respect to actions taken or not taken by the recipient based on any or all of the information or contents contained in these websites.

Any information sent to Legal WebTV Network LLC through this website is done using standard Web encryption techology. LegalView.com will exercise all reasonable care, within technological limits, to protect the confidentiality of any information submitted via Internet e-mail or through this website. By accessing this website, you may be seeking an attorney to represent you or legal advice. However, none of the sponsoring attorneys represent you yet.

The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.

Any transmission of information, whether via Internet e-mail or through the website, is solely for evaluation purposes by the sponsoring law firms and their associates. The transmission of any information to any attorney sponsoring advertising on LegalView.com or LegalWebMedia.com does not create an attorney-client relationship between the sender and any recipient. An attorney-client relationship can only be created by a written, signed-fee agreement entered into with an attorney. The sponsoring attorneys will treat your information as a confidential communication for the purpose of obtaining legal services or legal advice.

For more information about the sponsoring law firms, please click here.
This form is secure and encrypted. More information about secure forms and your privacy here.